<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<XML><RECORDS>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>White, W. Hunter</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Hutchens, Douglas E.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Jones, Carl</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Firkins, Larry D.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Paul, Allan J.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Smith, Larry L.</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Snyder, Daniel E.</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2006</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Therapeutic and persistent efficacy of spinosad applied as a pour-on or a topical spray against natural infestations of chewing and sucking lice on cattle</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>Veterinary Parasitology</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<DATE>October 4, 2006</DATE>
	<ACCESSION_NUMBER>46585</ACCESSION_NUMBER>
	<KEYWORDS>
		<KEYWORD>Bovicola</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>bovis</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Linognathus</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>vituli</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Solenopotes</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>capillatus</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>Haematopinus</KEYWORD>
		<KEYWORD>eurysternus</KEYWORD>
	</KEYWORDS>
	<ABSTRACT>Studies were conducted in Wisconsin and Illinois, USA, to assess and compare the therapeutic and persistent efficacy of spinosad when applied as either a pour-on or topical spray and compared with cyfluthrin pour-on and coumaphos topical spray for controlling natural infestations of chewing (Bovicola bovis) and sucking (Linognathus vituli, Solenopotes capillatus and Haematopinus eurysternus) lice on cattle. Thirty-five animals at each trial site were blocked according to pre-treatment lice counts and randomly allocated to one of five treatment groups: single treatments of spinosad (25g/L), diluted with water to 0.04% active ingredient and applied as a whole-body topical spray; spinosad (25g/L) applied as a neat pour-on at 2mg/kg body weight; Co-Ral((R)) Emulsifiable Livestock Insecticide (5.8% coumaphos), diluted to 0.03% active ingredient and applied as a whole-body topical spray; CyLence((R)) Pour-on Insecticide (1% cyfluthrin), applied as a neat pour-on at the manufacturer's recommended use rate for lice; and untreated control. Both spinosad treatments and cyfluthrin provided &gt;/=96% control of B. bovis for up to 7 weeks, whereas the efficacy of coumaphos dropped to &lt;90% after week 5 at one site. Spinosad spray had the best therapeutic and residual control of all treatments against L. vituli, &gt;/=98% for at least 5 weeks at both sites, compared with 3 weeks for coumaphos at one site. Spinosad and coumaphos sprays provided 100% control of S. capillatus for at least 8 weeks compared with &gt;/=97% control for spinosad and cyfluthrin pour-on treatments over the same interval. While H. eurysternus burden was low and limited to one study site, all four treatments provided 100% control for at least 6 weeks. These studies showed that topically applied spinosad provided a high degree of therapeutic and residual control against both sucking and chewing lice.</ABSTRACT>
	<NOTES>Journal</NOTES>
</RECORD>
</RECORDS></XML>